| tag.fdgsgfsdfg | |
|
+6sL1p $PiriT. Admin Vortex. King. coke 10 posters |
Which tag? | espionage | | 11% | [ 1 ] | coke | | 56% | [ 5 ] | insert | | 0% | [ 0 ] | Cool | | 33% | [ 3 ] |
| Total Votes : 9 | | Poll closed |
|
Author | Message |
---|
coke
Posts : 112 Join date : 2012-03-16 Location : big boss seat
| Subject: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Mon Mar 19, 2012 1:09 am | |
| | |
|
| |
King.
Posts : 142 Join date : 2012-03-14
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Mon Mar 19, 2012 2:03 am | |
| Sorry Coke The 2nd Ss Shows Tankjr Foot, I and Vortex And Some Other People Thought Its Frozen Body, Sorry Alot Bro Lol Silly Mistake Wont Happen Next Time... xD | |
|
| |
Vortex.
Posts : 17 Join date : 2012-03-15
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Mon Mar 19, 2012 2:04 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Admin Admin
Posts : 87 Join date : 2012-03-13
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Mon Mar 19, 2012 2:10 am | |
| Trolololololololol massive fail!! xD Coke is cleaned with a soap, our niggahs dont use cheetos anyway coke tags are really very nice, i like the cool one | |
|
| |
coke
Posts : 112 Join date : 2012-03-16 Location : big boss seat
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:58 am | |
| | |
|
| |
Admin Admin
Posts : 87 Join date : 2012-03-13
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:53 am | |
| Nothing just a big massive misunderstanding lol | |
|
| |
$PiriT.
Posts : 56 Join date : 2012-03-16 Age : 27 Location : Spain
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Mon Mar 19, 2012 12:27 pm | |
| it misses Exp tag [RC]<-NamE.
| |
|
| |
coke
Posts : 112 Join date : 2012-03-16 Location : big boss seat
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Mon Mar 19, 2012 1:29 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
sL1p
Posts : 13 Join date : 2012-03-19
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:28 am | |
| why dont u simply use
rc|name<-
simple and nice, u dont have to use always !+//=RC=/+![|name|]=//+!
you are welcome . | |
|
| |
Explosion
Posts : 200 Join date : 2012-03-14 Location : idk
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Fri Mar 23, 2012 9:29 am | |
| - sL1p wrote:
- why dont u simply use
rc|name<-
simple and nice, u dont have to use always !+//=RC=/+![|name|]=//+!
you are welcome . NICE | |
|
| |
King.
Posts : 142 Join date : 2012-03-14
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Fri Mar 23, 2012 10:57 am | |
| - sL1p wrote:
- why dont u simply use
rc|name<-
simple and nice, u dont have to use always !+//=RC=/+![|name|]=//+!
you are welcome . Thx Slipzor. | |
|
| |
King.
Posts : 142 Join date : 2012-03-14
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:49 am | |
| Kay.... Some leader or co-leader make a fucking permanent final tag ffs, all ask me whats the tag and i say Idk.... Just make a final decision and tell me which tag we will use >.> | |
|
| |
coke
Posts : 112 Join date : 2012-03-16 Location : big boss seat
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Sat Mar 24, 2012 10:20 am | |
| why dont we use explosions and sl1ps? both of them... | |
|
| |
b3nder
Posts : 16 Join date : 2012-03-21 Age : 34 Location : the couch
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Sat Mar 24, 2012 11:05 am | |
| - coke wrote:
- why dont we use explosions and sl1ps? both of them...
I'm ok with this. | |
|
| |
EDi
Posts : 36 Join date : 2012-03-19 Age : 29 Location : Finland
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:42 pm | |
| pls dont use slips, looks too much like our FC tag =) | |
|
| |
coke
Posts : 112 Join date : 2012-03-16 Location : big boss seat
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Sat Mar 24, 2012 2:45 pm | |
| smh.... i use different colors | |
|
| |
sL1p
Posts : 13 Join date : 2012-03-19
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:41 pm | |
| - EDi wrote:
- pls dont use slips, looks too much like our FC tag =)
more like dp's tag , but whatever. | |
|
| |
King.
Posts : 142 Join date : 2012-03-14
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:15 am | |
| This Tag^ I love it baby i will use that tag from now on | |
|
| |
Jayko
Posts : 51 Join date : 2012-03-16
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:36 am | |
| cmon decide for 1, [RC], and other one, a SIMPLE tag, simple seems so beautifull, belive me.. good luck | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: tag.fdgsgfsdfg | |
| |
|
| |
| tag.fdgsgfsdfg | |
|